AYAN ALIAS PANCHIYO AMINBHAI MULIYA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D C THAKER — 174/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN010004782026

Case disposed

Filing Number

174/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

174/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203023241032

Police Station

JUNAGADH A DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

AYAN ALIAS PANCHIYO AMINBHAI MULIYA

Adv. R D THAKER

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - D C THAKER

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

HEARING

09-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Junagadh approved a 30-day bail petition for the accused (Ayan Urf Panchiya Aminbhai Muliya) in a case involving criminal intimidation, robbery, and organized crime under IPC sections 397, 399-402, and 34. The court granted bail considering that the accused's mother requires medical treatment in Ahmedabad, and the accused's father (a travel agency owner) can ensure his attendance and supervise his conduct during the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Junagadh approved a 30-day bail petition for the accused (Ayan Urf Panchiya Aminbhai Muliya) in a case involving criminal intimidation, robbery, and organized crime under IPC sections 397, 399-402, and 34. The court granted bail considering that the accused's mother requires medical treatment in Ahmedabad, and the accused's father (a travel agency owner) can ensure his attendance and supervise his conduct during the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case