SANJAYBHAI S/O BHUPATBHAI KALABHAI AERDA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 171/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010004702026
Filing Number
171/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
171/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203024260061
Police Station
JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAYBHAI S/O BHUPATBHAI KALABHAI AERDA
Adv. Y M THAKOR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 05-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
CRMA No. 171-26 Summary The court granted bail to the accused Sanjaybhai S/O Bhupatbhai Kalabhai Aerda, charged under IPC Sections 136(2), 87, 64(2) and PoCS Act Section 6, by releasing him on bail under Section 438 CRPC. The court found that the investigation was still ongoing and the serious nature of charges (involving a minor) weighed against detention, but considering the accused's age (21), local residence, clean background, and love relationship with the victim's family, detention in judicial custody was deemed inappropriate. The court ordered his release with conditions to ensure trial participation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CRMA No. 171-26 Summary The court granted bail to the accused Sanjaybhai S/O Bhupatbhai Kalabhai Aerda, charged under IPC Sections 136(2), 87, 64(2) and PoCS Act Section 6, by releasing him on bail under Section 438 CRPC. The court found that the investigation was still ongoing and the serious nature of charges (involving a minor) weighed against detention, but considering the accused's age (21), local residence, clean background, and love relationship with the victim's family, detention in judicial custody was deemed inappropriate. The court ordered his release with conditions to ensure trial participation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts