SAMIT URFE BHURO DINESHBHAI KAPADI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 165/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN010004572026

Filing Number

165/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

165/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

3-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMIT URFE BHURO DINESHBHAI KAPADI

    Adv. Y M THAKOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sixth Additional Sessions Court, Junagadh granted bail to the accused under IPC Section 437, ordering his release on regular bail regarding a case registered under IPC Sections 8(c), 20(b)(2), and 29 NDPS Act. The court found that while the accused was arrested with contraband (cannabis weighing 3.75 kg), considering his young age, local residence, ongoing investigation, and absence of serious prior criminal history, detention was not necessary. The court balanced the gravity of drug trafficking offenses against mitigating factors favoring bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 165/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sixth Additional Sessions Court, Junagadh granted bail to the accused under IPC Section 437, ordering his release on regular bail regarding a case registered under IPC Sections 8(c), 20(b)(2), and 29 NDPS Act. The court found that while the accused was arrested with contraband (cannabis weighing 3.75 kg), considering his young age, local residence, ongoing investigation, and absence of serious prior criminal history, detention was not necessary. The court balanced the gravity of drug trafficking offenses against mitigating factors favoring bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case