ALPESH HIMATBHAI BARIYA (PARMAR) vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 163/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN010004472026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

163/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

163/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

13-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

ALPESH HIMATBHAI BARIYA (PARMAR)

Adv. N V SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT

RAMSINGBHAI MANSUKHBHAI DAMOR

Hearing History

Judge: 13-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

09-03-2026

ORDER

07-03-2026

HEARING

06-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by the accused (Alpesh Himatlal Parmar) against the bail denial order. The court held that the accused faced serious charges under the Indian Penal Code including aggravated sexual assault and rape of a minor girl (aged 12 years, 11 months, 19 days), and considering the gravity of offences, witness tampering risks, and overall circumstances, denying bail was justified to maintain public confidence in the justice system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by the accused (Alpesh Himatlal Parmar) against the bail denial order. The court held that the accused faced serious charges under the Indian Penal Code including aggravated sexual assault and rape of a minor girl (aged 12 years, 11 months, 19 days), and considering the gravity of offences, witness tampering risks, and overall circumstances, denying bail was justified to maintain public confidence in the justice system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case