ALPESH HIMATBHAI BARIYA (PARMAR) vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 163/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN010004472026

Filing Number

163/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

163/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

13-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALPESH HIMATBHAI BARIYA (PARMAR)

    Adv. N V SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT

  2. 2.RAMSINGBHAI MANSUKHBHAI DAMOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by the accused (Alpesh Himatlal Parmar) against the bail denial order. The court held that the accused faced serious charges under the Indian Penal Code including aggravated sexual assault and rape of a minor girl (aged 12 years, 11 months, 19 days), and considering the gravity of offences, witness tampering risks, and overall circumstances, denying bail was justified to maintain public confidence in the justice system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    5th Addl District Judge

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 163/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by the accused (Alpesh Himatlal Parmar) against the bail denial order. The court held that the accused faced serious charges under the Indian Penal Code including aggravated sexual assault and rape of a minor girl (aged 12 years, 11 months, 19 days), and considering the gravity of offences, witness tampering risks, and overall circumstances, denying bail was justified to maintain public confidence in the justice system. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case