SHEKH AAKIB SALIMBIN vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - V G DONGA — 12/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJJN010004422026
Filing Number
12/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
12/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203025250908
Police Station
JUNAGADH TALUKA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHEKH AAKIB SALIMBIN
Adv. R B PARMAR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - V G DONGA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 28-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 12/2026 Court Decision: The revision petition by Shekh Aakib Salimbin challenging the lower court's order regarding vehicle seizure under the Indian Penal Code Section 438 was dismissed. The court found that the seizure was lawful and the lower magistrate's order to seize the vehicle and forfeit it to the government was justified under applicable motor vehicle regulations. Key Reasoning: The court examined the evidence regarding a vehicle (registration GJ.11.CQ.9744) allegedly used in commission of a crime and found that the seizure complied with the Gujarat Prohibition Rules 2012 and IPC Section 438. The court upheld the magistrate's authority to order forfeiture and rejected the petitioner's contentions regarding procedural irregularities in the seizure process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 12/2026 Court Decision: The revision petition by Shekh Aakib Salimbin challenging the lower court's order regarding vehicle seizure under the Indian Penal Code Section 438 was dismissed. The court found that the seizure was lawful and the lower magistrate's order to seize the vehicle and forfeit it to the government was justified under applicable motor vehicle regulations. Key Reasoning: The court examined the evidence regarding a vehicle (registration GJ.11.CQ.9744) allegedly used in commission of a crime and found that the seizure complied with the Gujarat Prohibition Rules 2012 and IPC Section 438. The court upheld the magistrate's authority to order forfeiture and rejected the petitioner's contentions regarding procedural irregularities in the seizure process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts