SONBAIBEN SANGANBHAI SANGHIA vs ZURICH KOTAK GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD — 66/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJJN010004402026

Filing Number

66/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

66/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONBAIBEN SANGANBHAI SANGHIA

    Adv. K L SANCHELA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ZURICH KOTAK GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Junagadh) ordered disbursement of ₹2,25,791 to claimant Sonbai Sanganbhai Sanghia through NEFT/RTGS after his motor accident insurance claim against Zurch Kotak General Insurance was settled via Lok Adalat compromise on 13.12.2025. The court approved full payment without court fee deduction and noted the settlement would not operate as res judicata for other claims arising from the same accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Junagadh) ordered disbursement of ₹2,25,791 to claimant Sonbai Sanganbhai Sanghia through NEFT/RTGS after his motor accident insurance claim against Zurch Kotak General Insurance was settled via Lok Adalat compromise on 13.12.2025. The court approved full payment without court fee deduction and noted the settlement would not operate as res judicata for other claims arising from the same accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case