BHAVINKUMAR BHAGVANJIBHAI JADAV vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 34/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJJN010004362026

Filing Number

34/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

34/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAVINKUMAR BHAGVANJIBHAI JADAV

    Adv. K L SANCHELA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Principal District Judge of Junagadh permitted the petitioner to sue as an indigent person in a motor accident compensation claim, finding no evidence that the petitioner had sufficient means to pay court fees and accepting the advocate's undertaking to cover fees if needed. The court noted that under the beneficial Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the State can later dispute the indigency claim if the petitioner's financial circumstances change. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal District Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District Judge of Junagadh permitted the petitioner to sue as an indigent person in a motor accident compensation claim, finding no evidence that the petitioner had sufficient means to pay court fees and accepting the advocate's undertaking to cover fees if needed. The court noted that under the beneficial Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the State can later dispute the indigency claim if the petitioner's financial circumstances change. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case