PRAKASHBHAI VALLABHBHAI TANK HEIRS OF LATE HARSHKUMAR PRAKASHBHAI TANK vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 33/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJJN010004352026

Filing Number

33/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASHBHAI VALLABHBHAI TANK HEIRS OF LATE HARSHKUMAR PRAKASHBHAI TANK

    Adv. D N MULCHANDANI

  2. 2.JAYABEN VALLABHBHAI TANK

    Adv. D N MULCHANDANI

  3. 3.MEET PRAKASHBHAI TANK

    Adv. D N MULCHANDANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court permitted the petitioners to sue as indigent persons in a motor accident compensation claim involving death due to accident injuries. The court accepted the advocate's affidavit declaring the petitioners' inability to pay court fees and agreed to allow the petition under the beneficial Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, with the condition that petitioners deposit requisite court fees if their property exceeds limits declared in the schedule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal District Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court permitted the petitioners to sue as indigent persons in a motor accident compensation claim involving death due to accident injuries. The court accepted the advocate's affidavit declaring the petitioners' inability to pay court fees and agreed to allow the petition under the beneficial Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, with the condition that petitioners deposit requisite court fees if their property exceeds limits declared in the schedule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case