HARDASBHAI PUNJABHAI PARMAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 154/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010003752026
Filing Number
154/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
154/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203023251246
Police Station
JUNAGADH A DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARDASBHAI PUNJABHAI PARMAR
Adv. K H DHAMANI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-02-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA No. 154-26 Court Decision: The court granted bail to the accused Hardasbhai Punjabhai Parmar under Section 437(2), 437(4), and 61(2) of CrPC, and Section 66(D) of the IT Act. The court found that while the accused was involved in an alleged cybercrime involving online fraud and misappropriation of bank funds totaling approximately Rs. 1,42,89,546, he required medical treatment and had already suffered physical injuries during custody. The court imposed conditions including surety and directed that the accused receive proper medical care at government hospitals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA No. 154-26 Court Decision: The court granted bail to the accused Hardasbhai Punjabhai Parmar under Section 437(2), 437(4), and 61(2) of CrPC, and Section 66(D) of the IT Act. The court found that while the accused was involved in an alleged cybercrime involving online fraud and misappropriation of bank funds totaling approximately Rs. 1,42,89,546, he required medical treatment and had already suffered physical injuries during custody. The court imposed conditions including surety and directed that the accused receive proper medical care at government hospitals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts