ARMAN S/O JAHIDBHAI ALIAS JAHANGIRBHAI SULEMANBHAI THAIM vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP, N K PUROHIT — 149/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010003622026
Filing Number
149/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
149/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203024260100
Police Station
JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARMAN S/O JAHIDBHAI ALIAS JAHANGIRBHAI SULEMANBHAI THAIM
Adv. B K SANDH
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP, N K PUROHIT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA 149/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Arman (alias Jahidbhai) in a criminal matter involving charges under IPC Sections 64(2)(a), 65(1), 115(2), and POCSO Act Section 6. The court found that while serious allegations existed regarding a minor, the petitioner's custodial detention was not justified given the investigative stage and the applicant's local residence, lack of criminal history, and the complainant's own conduct in initially concealing the relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA 149/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Arman (alias Jahidbhai) in a criminal matter involving charges under IPC Sections 64(2)(a), 65(1), 115(2), and POCSO Act Section 6. The court found that while serious allegations existed regarding a minor, the petitioner's custodial detention was not justified given the investigative stage and the applicant's local residence, lack of criminal history, and the complainant's own conduct in initially concealing the relationship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts