SHREE MADDAN MOHANLALJI HAVELI URFE MOTI HAVELI PIYUSHBAVAJI KISHORCHANDRA GOSWAMI vs HIERS OF DECD RAMNIKLAL PRBHDASH RAJPARA — 26/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 08th April 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT
CNR: GJJN010003112026
Filing Number
26/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
26/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHREE MADDAN MOHANLALJI HAVELI URFE MOTI HAVELI PIYUSHBAVAJI KISHORCHANDRA GOSWAMI
Adv. S B JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIERS OF DECD RAMNIKLAL PRBHDASH RAJPARA
-
2.CHERITY COMMINSIONER SHREE
Adv. SERVED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary The Principal District Judge of Junagadh granted the applicant's petition to condone a 27-day delay in filing an appeal against a lower court judgment rejecting multiple civil suits regarding the Moti Haveli Trust. The court, citing the Supreme Court's precedent in B. Madhuri Goud v. Damodar Reddy, prioritized substantial justice over technical procedural requirements, holding that the delay was bona fide and caused while obtaining legal instructions. The applicant must pay ₹300 costs to each opponent within 7 days, with cost payment being a condition precedent for delay condonation and appeal registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2026
Summary The Principal District Judge of Junagadh granted the applicant's petition to condone a 27-day delay in filing an appeal against a lower court judgment rejecting multiple civil suits regarding the Moti Haveli Trust. The court, citing the Supreme Court's precedent in B. Madhuri Goud v. Damodar Reddy, prioritized substantial justice over technical procedural requirements, holding that the delay was bona fide and caused while obtaining legal instructions. The applicant must pay ₹300 costs to each opponent within 7 days, with cost payment being a condition precedent for delay condonation and appeal registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts