SANDIP PRAVINBHAI RATHOD vs MALSIHBHAI GAJASURBHAI MALANI Advocate - C U KHUNT — 5/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 21st April 2026.
MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: GJJN010001782026
Filing Number
5/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
27-Jan-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANDIP PRAVINBHAI RATHOD
Adv. K L SANCHELA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MALSIHBHAI GAJASURBHAI MALANI Advocate - C U KHUNT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Order
The Junagadh MAC Tribunal disposed of MAC Execution Petition No. 5/2026 filed by Sandip Pravinbhai Rathod as withdrawn on 21.04.2026. The petitioner's advocate withdrew the petition stating that compromise efforts were ongoing with the opponent, and the court granted liberty to file the petition afresh with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Order
Principal District Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal District Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal District Judge
-
14-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2026
The Junagadh MAC Tribunal disposed of MAC Execution Petition No. 5/2026 filed by Sandip Pravinbhai Rathod as withdrawn on 21.04.2026. The petitioner's advocate withdrew the petition stating that compromise efforts were ongoing with the opponent, and the court granted liberty to file the petition afresh with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts