Ketan Jagdishbhai Nanda vs Shari Krishna Products Advocate - A B MAKWANA — 34/2025
Case under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 16th March 2026.
WC MIS LC - W.C. Misc. Application under Rule
CNR: GJJM130004852025
Filing Number
34/2025
Filing Date
06-Oct-2025
Registration No
34/2025
Registration Date
06-Oct-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
2-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ketan Jagdishbhai Nanda
Adv. J D PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shari Krishna Products Advocate - A B MAKWANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 34/2025 Petitioner: Ketan Jagdishbhai Nanda Respondent: Shari Krishna Products The court upheld the petitioner's wage recovery claim against the respondent employer under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The petitioner was awarded ₹2,11,000 in total compensation, comprising ₹1,40,000 as salary arrears, ₹10,000 as penalty, and ₹56,000 as 12% interest from the default date through March 2026, plus ₹5,000 in costs. The court found the respondent's failure to comply with the previous decree and ordered recovery through the Collector, Jamnagar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Feb-2026
Judgement
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Feb-2026
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Feb-2026
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Jan-2026
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Jan-2026
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2025
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Dec-2025
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Nov-2025
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 34/2025
Case Summary: 34/2025 Petitioner: Ketan Jagdishbhai Nanda Respondent: Shari Krishna Products The court upheld the petitioner's wage recovery claim against the respondent employer under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The petitioner was awarded ₹2,11,000 in total compensation, comprising ₹1,40,000 as salary arrears, ₹10,000 as penalty, and ₹56,000 as 12% interest from the default date through March 2026, plus ₹5,000 in costs. The court found the respondent's failure to comply with the previous decree and ordered recovery through the Collector, Jamnagar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts