Shantilal Chaganbhai Chabhadiya vs Kary Palak Ijnershari Rajkot Advocate - A G P — 75/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJM130004282024
Filing Number
75/2024
Filing Date
02-Dec-2024
Registration No
75/2024
Registration Date
02-Dec-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shantilal Chaganbhai Chabhadiya
Adv. P R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kary Palak Ijnershari Rajkot Advocate - A G P
-
2.Nayab Kary Palak Ijnershri Dharol
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 75/2024 The Labour Court rejected the reference filed by Shantilal Chaganbhai Chabhadiya against his termination from employment. The court found that while the worker had completed 10+ years of continuous service as a casual laborer from 2000 to July 1, 2010, he failed to substantiate his claim with documentary evidence. Despite procedural violations in the termination (lack of written notice, severance pay, and gratuity), the court's decision hinged on insufficient proof and the reference being filed 15 years after termination, beyond applicable statutory timelines under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jul-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Mar-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Mar-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 75/2024
Summary of Case 75/2024 The Labour Court rejected the reference filed by Shantilal Chaganbhai Chabhadiya against his termination from employment. The court found that while the worker had completed 10+ years of continuous service as a casual laborer from 2000 to July 1, 2010, he failed to substantiate his claim with documentary evidence. Despite procedural violations in the termination (lack of written notice, severance pay, and gratuity), the court's decision hinged on insufficient proof and the reference being filed 15 years after termination, beyond applicable statutory timelines under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts