Devrajbhai Bhagvanjibhai Busa vs Kary Palak Ijnershri Rajkot Advocate - A G P — 74/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJJM130004272024

Filing Number

74/2024

Filing Date

02-Dec-2024

Registration No

74/2024

Registration Date

02-Dec-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Devrajbhai Bhagvanjibhai Busa

    Adv. P R JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kary Palak Ijnershri Rajkot Advocate - A G P

  2. 2.Nayab Kary Palak Ijnershri Dharol

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 74/2024 Devrajbhai Bhagvanjibhai Busa v. Kary Palak Ijnershri Rajkot Advocate & Nayab Kary Palak Ijnershri Dharol The Labour Court rejected the worker's industrial dispute reference. The petitioner was dismissed without due process after working as a daily-wage laborer since 1999 without completing 240 consecutive days in any single year. The court held the dismissal illegal under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 25(F), as proper notice and severance pay were not provided. The court ordered the worker's reinstatement with continuity of service and backwages, finding the employer violated mandatory termination procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 31-Dec-2025

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 24-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 20-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 17-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 10-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 26-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 15-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 08-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 24-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 10-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 20-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 16-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 18-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 21-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 09-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 26-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 12-Mar-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 05-Mar-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 19-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 22-Jan-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 08-Jan-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 18-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 02-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 74/2024 Devrajbhai Bhagvanjibhai Busa v. Kary Palak Ijnershri Rajkot Advocate & Nayab Kary Palak Ijnershri Dharol The Labour Court rejected the worker's industrial dispute reference. The petitioner was dismissed without due process after working as a daily-wage laborer since 1999 without completing 240 consecutive days in any single year. The court held the dismissal illegal under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 25(F), as proper notice and severance pay were not provided. The court ordered the worker's reinstatement with continuity of service and backwages, finding the employer violated mandatory termination procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case