Parvin Devshibhai Garsondiya vs Nayab Kary Palak Ijnershri Advocate - A G P — 61/2024

JudegementView PDF

Case Summary: 61/2024 Petitioner: Parvin Devshibhai Garsondiya Respondent: Nayab Kary Palak Ijnershri Advocate (Irrigation Department) Decision: The court dismissed the petitioner's reference, rejecting claims of illegal termination from daily-wage employment. Key Issue: Whether the petitioner was illegally terminated without due process under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Court's Finding: The court determined the petitioner failed to establish continuous employment for the required 240 days and lacked sufficient documentary evidence to prove wrongful dismissal. The employer's defense that the work was outsourced after 2015 was accepted. The court upheld the termination as procedurally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Judge, Labour Court

For Order

Judge, Labour Court

For Order

Judge, Labour Court

For Order

Judge, Labour Court

For Arguement of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Arguement of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Statement of Claim

Judge, Labour Court

For Statement of Claim

Judge, Labour Court

For Statement of Claim

Judge, Labour Court

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 61/2024