Rajesh Chaganbhai Khatrani vs Nayab Kary Palak Ijnershri Advocate - A G P — 60/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJM130003462024
Filing Number
60/2024
Filing Date
10-Sep-2024
Registration No
60/2024
Registration Date
10-Sep-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajesh Chaganbhai Khatrani
Adv. P R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nayab Kary Palak Ijnershri Advocate - A G P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case 60/2024 Summary The Jamnagar Labour Court rejected the employer's reference against reinstatement of a daily-wage worker. The court found that Rajesh Khatrani was terminated illegally without proper notice or severance pay on 30/11/2019 after working continuously since 1998. Despite the seven-year delay in filing, the court ruled the termination violated Industrial Disputes Act provisions requiring notice, explanation, and compensation before dismissal of workers with continuous service records. The reference was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jul-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Mar-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Mar-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Dec-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Dec-2024
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Nov-2024
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Nov-2024
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 60/2024
Case 60/2024 Summary The Jamnagar Labour Court rejected the employer's reference against reinstatement of a daily-wage worker. The court found that Rajesh Khatrani was terminated illegally without proper notice or severance pay on 30/11/2019 after working continuously since 1998. Despite the seven-year delay in filing, the court ruled the termination violated Industrial Disputes Act provisions requiring notice, explanation, and compensation before dismissal of workers with continuous service records. The reference was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts