Sangitaben Harishbhai Khaniya vs Neprorecores Managenet Pvt Ltd — 52/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJJM130002122025

Filing Number

52/2025

Filing Date

13-May-2025

Registration No

52/2025

Registration Date

13-May-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR

Judge

2-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sangitaben Harishbhai Khaniya

    Adv. H H DEDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Neprorecores Managenet Pvt Ltd

  2. 2.Shari Ganesh Manpower Suplayer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 52/2025 Sangitaben Harishbhai Khaniya v. Neprorecores Management Pvt Ltd & Shari Ganesh Manpower Supplier The court partially allowed the petitioner's claim for unlawful termination. The petitioner, employed for over 5 years at Rs. 497/day with 240+ continuous days of work, was terminated without notice or legal procedure on 30.09.2024. The court found the termination violated ID Act Section 25(B) requirements. The court awarded the petitioner Rs. 30,000 as compensation in lieu of reinstatement and directed the employer to pay this amount within 30 days. The petitioner's claim for back wages and full reinstatement was partially rejected, though the court acknowledged unlawful termination occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 27-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 12-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 05-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 02-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 26-Dec-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 22-Dec-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 12-Dec-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 28-Nov-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 24-Nov-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 07-Nov-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 07-Oct-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 29-Sep-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 19-Sep-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 09-Sep-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 29-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 12-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 02-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 14-Jul-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 01-Jul-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 17-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 13-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 52/2025 Sangitaben Harishbhai Khaniya v. Neprorecores Management Pvt Ltd & Shari Ganesh Manpower Supplier The court partially allowed the petitioner's claim for unlawful termination. The petitioner, employed for over 5 years at Rs. 497/day with 240+ continuous days of work, was terminated without notice or legal procedure on 30.09.2024. The court found the termination violated ID Act Section 25(B) requirements. The court awarded the petitioner Rs. 30,000 as compensation in lieu of reinstatement and directed the employer to pay this amount within 30 days. The petitioner's claim for back wages and full reinstatement was partially rejected, though the court acknowledged unlawful termination occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case