Shantaben Rameshbhai Ghavad vs Neprorecores Managenet Pvt Ltd — 50/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 17th April 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJM130002102025
Filing Number
50/2025
Filing Date
13-May-2025
Registration No
50/2025
Registration Date
13-May-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
2-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shantaben Rameshbhai Ghavad
Adv. H H DEDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Neprorecores Managenet Pvt Ltd
-
2.Shri Ganesh Manpower Suplyer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 50/2025 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petitioner's claim. The court found that Neprorecores Management Pvt Ltd unlawfully terminated the petitioner's employment without following proper legal procedures, violating the ID Act's Section 25(B) requirements. The petitioner is entitled to reinstatement or, in the alternative, compensation of ₹30,000 for the illegal termination. Key Reasoning: The employer terminated the petitioner without providing written notice of reasons, opportunity to be heard, or any formal disciplinary process, acting arbitrarily. The court determined the petitioner had worked over 5 years continuously, meeting statutory protections under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Apr-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Mar-2026
For Arguement of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2026
For Arguement of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Mar-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Mar-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Feb-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Feb-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Feb-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Dec-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Dec-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Dec-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Nov-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Nov-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Nov-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Oct-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Sep-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Sep-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Sep-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Aug-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Aug-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Aug-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Jul-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Jul-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 50/2025
Case Summary: 50/2025 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petitioner's claim. The court found that Neprorecores Management Pvt Ltd unlawfully terminated the petitioner's employment without following proper legal procedures, violating the ID Act's Section 25(B) requirements. The petitioner is entitled to reinstatement or, in the alternative, compensation of ₹30,000 for the illegal termination. Key Reasoning: The employer terminated the petitioner without providing written notice of reasons, opportunity to be heard, or any formal disciplinary process, acting arbitrarily. The court determined the petitioner had worked over 5 years continuously, meeting statutory protections under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts