Shantaben Rameshbhai Ghavad vs Neprorecores Managenet Pvt Ltd — 50/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJJM130002102025

Filing Number

50/2025

Filing Date

13-May-2025

Registration No

50/2025

Registration Date

13-May-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR

Judge

2-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shantaben Rameshbhai Ghavad

    Adv. H H DEDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Neprorecores Managenet Pvt Ltd

  2. 2.Shri Ganesh Manpower Suplyer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 50/2025 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petitioner's claim. The court found that Neprorecores Management Pvt Ltd unlawfully terminated the petitioner's employment without following proper legal procedures, violating the ID Act's Section 25(B) requirements. The petitioner is entitled to reinstatement or, in the alternative, compensation of ₹30,000 for the illegal termination. Key Reasoning: The employer terminated the petitioner without providing written notice of reasons, opportunity to be heard, or any formal disciplinary process, acting arbitrarily. The court determined the petitioner had worked over 5 years continuously, meeting statutory protections under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 27-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 12-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 05-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 02-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 26-Dec-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 22-Dec-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 12-Dec-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 28-Nov-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 24-Nov-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 07-Nov-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 07-Oct-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 29-Sep-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 19-Sep-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 09-Sep-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 29-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 12-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 02-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 14-Jul-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 01-Jul-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 17-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 13-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 50/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 50/2025 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petitioner's claim. The court found that Neprorecores Management Pvt Ltd unlawfully terminated the petitioner's employment without following proper legal procedures, violating the ID Act's Section 25(B) requirements. The petitioner is entitled to reinstatement or, in the alternative, compensation of ₹30,000 for the illegal termination. Key Reasoning: The employer terminated the petitioner without providing written notice of reasons, opportunity to be heard, or any formal disciplinary process, acting arbitrarily. The court determined the petitioner had worked over 5 years continuously, meeting statutory protections under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case