Late-Viraslavam Kaniyalal Aditra Legal Dependance Kaniyalal Armugam Aditravad vs Carbonic Industries Advocate - A N SHAM — 3/2022

Case under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 10. Status: For Arguement of opponent. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

For Arguement of opponent Next hearing 30-Jun-2026 this date has passed

WC FATAL LC - W.C. Application Fatal

CNR: GJJM130001842022

Filing Number

3/2022

Filing Date

27-Jun-2022

Registration No

3/2022

Registration Date

27-Jun-2022

Court

LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Late-Viraslavam Kaniyalal Aditra Legal Dependance Kaniyalal Armugam Aditravad

    Adv. D M KAVAIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Carbonic Industries Advocate - A N SHAM

  2. 2.The New India Ins Co Ltd

    Adv. R P TANNA

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 12-May-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 05-May-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 21-Apr-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    For Closing pursis of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    For Closing pursis of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    For Closing pursis of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    For Closing pursis of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    For Closing pursis of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    For Closing pursis of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    For Closing pursis of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 06-Jan-2026

    For Closing pursis of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 23-Dec-2025

    For Closing pursis of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 09-Dec-2025

    For Closing pursis of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 25-Nov-2025

    For Closing pursis of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 19-Nov-2025

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 04-Nov-2025

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 14-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 29-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 16-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 28-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 05-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 15-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 07-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 16-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 22-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 03-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 04-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 18-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 10-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  33. 27-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  34. 20-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  35. 07-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  36. 16-Dec-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  37. 10-Dec-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  38. 02-Dec-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  39. 26-Nov-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  40. 25-Nov-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  41. 11-Nov-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  42. 21-Oct-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  43. 08-Oct-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  44. 24-Sep-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  45. 11-Sep-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  46. 27-Aug-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  47. 29-Jul-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  48. 22-Jul-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  49. 08-Jul-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  50. 24-Jun-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  51. 20-Jun-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  52. 04-Jun-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  53. 14-May-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  54. 16-Apr-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  55. 07-Mar-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  56. 26-Feb-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  57. 23-Feb-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  58. 19-Feb-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  59. 05-Feb-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  60. 22-Jan-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  61. 15-Jan-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  62. 14-Dec-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  63. 04-Dec-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  64. 09-Nov-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  65. 23-Oct-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  66. 09-Oct-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  67. 04-Sep-2023

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 3/2022 The petition filed by the legal dependents of Late Viraslavam Kaniyalal Aditra seeking to implead Carbonic Industries and The New India Insurance Co Ltd as a party to the case was rejected and dismissed. The court found that the insurance policy under which the claim was filed (01/01/2022 to 31/12/2022) was not in existence on the date of the worker's death (08/12/2021), and therefore the insurance company bore no liability. The court held that joining the insurance company as a party was neither justified nor appropriate under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  68. 04-Sep-2023

    For Framing of Issue

    Judge, Labour Court

  69. 08-Aug-2023

    For Framing of Issue

    Judge, Labour Court

  70. 13-Jul-2023

    For Framing of Issue

    Judge, Labour Court

  71. 04-Jul-2023

    For Framing of Issue

    Judge, Labour Court

  72. 12-Jun-2023

    For Framing of Issue

    Judge, Labour Court

  73. 02-May-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  74. 11-Apr-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  75. 07-Mar-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  76. 13-Feb-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  77. 23-Jan-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  78. 09-Jan-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  79. 12-Dec-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  80. 07-Nov-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  81. 03-Oct-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  82. 01-Sep-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  83. 27-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  84. 27-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 3/2022 The petition filed by the legal dependents of Late Viraslavam Kaniyalal Aditra seeking to implead Carbonic Industries and The New India Insurance Co Ltd as a party to the case was rejected and dismissed. The court found that the insurance policy under which the claim was filed (01/01/2022 to 31/12/2022) was not in existence on the date of the worker's death (08/12/2021), and therefore the insurance company bore no liability. The court held that joining the insurance company as a party was neither justified nor appropriate under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case