Hasmukhbhai Dayabhai Malani vs Karay Palak Ijnershri Rajkot — 42/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJJM130001692025

Filing Number

42/2025

Filing Date

22-Apr-2025

Registration No

42/2025

Registration Date

22-Apr-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hasmukhbhai Dayabhai Malani

    Adv. P R JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karay Palak Ijnershri Rajkot

  2. 2.Nayab Karay Palak Ijnershri Dharol

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 42/2025 The Labour Court rejected petitioner Hasmukhbhai Dayabhai Malani's reference against respondents (irrigation department officials) seeking reinstatement with back wages. The court found that Malani failed to conclusively prove continuous employment for 240 days in a given year, despite testimony and submissions claiming he worked as a daily laborer from 2005-2013 before termination on 01/05/2013 without proper notice or compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 31-Dec-2025

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 24-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 20-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 17-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 10-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 26-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 15-Oct-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 08-Oct-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 01-Oct-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 24-Sep-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 10-Sep-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 20-Aug-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 16-Jul-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 18-Jun-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 28-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 22-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 42/2025 The Labour Court rejected petitioner Hasmukhbhai Dayabhai Malani's reference against respondents (irrigation department officials) seeking reinstatement with back wages. The court found that Malani failed to conclusively prove continuous employment for 240 days in a given year, despite testimony and submissions claiming he worked as a daily laborer from 2005-2013 before termination on 01/05/2013 without proper notice or compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case