Jitendrbhai Lalajibhai Shankhapara vs Karay Palak Ijnershri Sinchai Vibhag Rajkot — 27/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJM130001132025
Filing Number
27/2025
Filing Date
04-Mar-2025
Registration No
27/2025
Registration Date
04-Mar-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jitendrbhai Lalajibhai Shankhapara
Adv. P R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karay Palak Ijnershri Sinchai Vibhag Rajkot
-
2.Nayab Karay Palak Ijnershri Dharol
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 27/2025 The Labour Court dismissed the industrial dispute petition filed by Jitendrabhai Lalajibhai Shankhapara against the Irrigation Department (Rajkot) and its subordinate officer. The court found that the petitioner, a daily-wage laborer, failed to conclusively prove continuous employment for 240 days as required under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to qualify for termination protections. Although the petitioner claimed continuous work from June 2007 to May 2013, the lack of documentary evidence (muster rolls, appointment letters, wage registers) and the significant 12-year delay in filing the case undermined the claim. The court upheld the respondent's position that inadequate proof and procedural delays made the petition untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jul-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-May-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 27/2025
Summary of Case 27/2025 The Labour Court dismissed the industrial dispute petition filed by Jitendrabhai Lalajibhai Shankhapara against the Irrigation Department (Rajkot) and its subordinate officer. The court found that the petitioner, a daily-wage laborer, failed to conclusively prove continuous employment for 240 days as required under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to qualify for termination protections. Although the petitioner claimed continuous work from June 2007 to May 2013, the lack of documentary evidence (muster rolls, appointment letters, wage registers) and the significant 12-year delay in filing the case undermined the claim. The court upheld the respondent's position that inadequate proof and procedural delays made the petition untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts