Ghelabhai Jodhabhai Gamara vs Karay Palak Ijnershri Sinchai Vibhag Rajokt — 26/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJM130001122025
Filing Number
26/2025
Filing Date
04-Mar-2025
Registration No
26/2025
Registration Date
04-Mar-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ghelabhai Jodhabhai Gamara
Adv. P R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karay Palak Ijnershri Sinchai Vibhag Rajokt
-
2.Nayab Karay Palak Ijnershri Dharol
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Reference (T) No. 26/2025 Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the employer's reference challenging reinstatement of a daily-wage worker. The worker, Ghelabhai Jodhabhai Gamara, was found to have been illegally terminated without proper notice, compensation, or severance under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Key Reasoning: The court determined the worker completed continuous service exceeding 240 days (required threshold for permanent status under Indian labour law) from 2007 to May 2013 at the irrigation department. The employer failed to follow mandatory termination procedures—no written notice, no severance pay, no backdated compensation. Since procedural requirements under Section 25(F) were breached, the termination was deemed unlawful and the worker's reinstatement with continuity of service was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jul-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-May-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2025
Case Summary: Reference (T) No. 26/2025 Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the employer's reference challenging reinstatement of a daily-wage worker. The worker, Ghelabhai Jodhabhai Gamara, was found to have been illegally terminated without proper notice, compensation, or severance under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Key Reasoning: The court determined the worker completed continuous service exceeding 240 days (required threshold for permanent status under Indian labour law) from 2007 to May 2013 at the irrigation department. The employer failed to follow mandatory termination procedures—no written notice, no severance pay, no backdated compensation. Since procedural requirements under Section 25(F) were breached, the termination was deemed unlawful and the worker's reinstatement with continuity of service was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts