Mukundbhai Mahendrabhai Trivedi vs Karay Palak Ijnershri Sinchai Vibhag Rajkot — 24/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJM130001102025
Filing Number
24/2025
Filing Date
04-Mar-2025
Registration No
24/2025
Registration Date
04-Mar-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mukundbhai Mahendrabhai Trivedi
Adv. P R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karay Palak Ijnershri Sinchai Vibhag Rajkot
-
2.Nayab Karay Palak Inershri Dharol
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 24/2025 The court dismissed the petitioner Mukundbhai Mahendrabhai Trivedi's reference against the irrigation department for illegal termination. The tribunal found that while the petitioner worked as a daily-wage laborer from 2007-2013, he failed to provide sufficient evidence that he worked 240 continuous days in a year as required by industrial law to claim permanent employment status. Although the petitioner established he performed regular work, the burden of proof for continuous employment fell on him, and without documentary evidence (muster rolls, appointment letters, wage registers), the court could not grant relief for reinstatement with back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jul-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-May-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 24/2025
Summary of Case 24/2025 The court dismissed the petitioner Mukundbhai Mahendrabhai Trivedi's reference against the irrigation department for illegal termination. The tribunal found that while the petitioner worked as a daily-wage laborer from 2007-2013, he failed to provide sufficient evidence that he worked 240 continuous days in a year as required by industrial law to claim permanent employment status. Although the petitioner established he performed regular work, the burden of proof for continuous employment fell on him, and without documentary evidence (muster rolls, appointment letters, wage registers), the court could not grant relief for reinstatement with back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts