Jayendrasinh K Jadeja vs Rajnikant Amrutlal Nakum — 1/2026
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 02nd April 2026.
MISC26A LC - Misc. Application - Under Rule-26A
CNR: GJJM130000212026
Filing Number
1/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jayendrasinh K Jadeja
Adv. A N SHAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajnikant Amrutlal Nakum
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: ID Petition 1/2026 The Labor Court of Jamnagar allowed petitioner Jayendrasinh K. Jadeja's application under Industrial Disputes Act Rule 26(A) to add the respondent's legal heir (Vijayaben Amrutlal Nakum) as a party following the original respondent Rajnikant Amrutlal Nakum's death. The court ordered the petitioner's organization to pay the worker ₹7,000 as compensation costs, set aside the original tribunal award, and direct the case back to the labor board, while imposing an additional penalty of ₹5,000 on the petitioner organization for procedural violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Mar-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Mar-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2026
Case Summary: ID Petition 1/2026 The Labor Court of Jamnagar allowed petitioner Jayendrasinh K. Jadeja's application under Industrial Disputes Act Rule 26(A) to add the respondent's legal heir (Vijayaben Amrutlal Nakum) as a party following the original respondent Rajnikant Amrutlal Nakum's death. The court ordered the petitioner's organization to pay the worker ₹7,000 as compensation costs, set aside the original tribunal award, and direct the case back to the labor board, while imposing an additional penalty of ₹5,000 on the petitioner organization for procedural violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts