Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI HARESHBHAI PADHARESHA Advocate - J N VYAS — 2041/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,454. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM110023512024

Filing Number

2041/2024

Filing Date

18-Dec-2024

Registration No

2041/2024

Registration Date

18-Dec-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202056240104

Police Station

KALAVAD RURAL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 380,454

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYBHAI HARESHBHAI PADHARESHA Advocate - J N VYAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CC NO. 2041/2024 Court Decision: The accused Vijay Laloo Tiluali Hareshbhai Padharesha was acquitted of all charges due to insufficient evidence establishing his guilt beyond reasonable doubt in a theft case involving a donation box from a temple in Navagam village. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution established that a theft of a donation box containing approximately ₹24,960 occurred at a private temple, the court found that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused specifically committed this theft. The complainant did not witness the accused stealing the donation box, circumstantial evidence and witness statements were inconclusive, no fingerprints or physical evidence connected the accused to the crime, and the recovery of stolen items did not definitively link the accused to the crime scene. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 29-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 07-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 09-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 18-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2041/2024

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CC NO. 2041/2024 Court Decision: The accused Vijay Laloo Tiluali Hareshbhai Padharesha was acquitted of all charges due to insufficient evidence establishing his guilt beyond reasonable doubt in a theft case involving a donation box from a temple in Navagam village. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution established that a theft of a donation box containing approximately ₹24,960 occurred at a private temple, the court found that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused specifically committed this theft. The complainant did not witness the accused stealing the donation box, circumstantial evidence and witness statements were inconclusive, no fingerprints or physical evidence connected the accused to the crime, and the recovery of stolen items did not definitively link the accused to the crime scene. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case