PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER vs GHELABHAI NARANBHAI — 19/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,36. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 21st April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJJM110020792025
Filing Number
19/2025
Filing Date
13-11-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
13-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER
Adv. P D JADEJA
Respondent(s)
GHELABHAI NARANBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 16-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 09-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 24-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed PGVCL's petition for default, finding that the petitioner failed to pursue the case with due diligence and showed no genuine interest in advancing the proceedings. The court determined that since no responsible officer of the petitioner was present to implement the warrant, and multiple warrants had been returned unexecuted, dismissal for default was the only appropriate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed PGVCL's petition for default, finding that the petitioner failed to pursue the case with due diligence and showed no genuine interest in advancing the proceedings. The court determined that since no responsible officer of the petitioner was present to implement the warrant, and multiple warrants had been returned unexecuted, dismissal for default was the only appropriate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts