PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER vs RAMDAS PURANDAS — 18/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,36. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 16th May 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJJM110020782025
Filing Number
18/2025
Filing Date
13-11-2025
Registration No
18/2025
Registration Date
13-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER
Adv. P D JADEJA
Respondent(s)
RAMDAS PURANDAS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-05-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 04-05-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 02-05-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 21-04-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 18/2025 Summary The court rejected the respondent Ramdas Purandas's petition challenging Section 14 proceedings initiated by PGVCL. The court found that the respondent failed to provide sufficient grounds to discontinue the Section 14 case and that the existing decree remained valid. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition and imposed court fees on the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 18/2025 Summary The court rejected the respondent Ramdas Purandas's petition challenging Section 14 proceedings initiated by PGVCL. The court found that the respondent failed to provide sufficient grounds to discontinue the Section 14 case and that the existing decree remained valid. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition and imposed court fees on the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts