PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER vs MAHEBUBBHAI MAMADBHAI GABOL — 131/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 20th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJM110018682025
Filing Number
131/2025
Filing Date
15-Oct-2025
Registration No
131/2025
Registration Date
15-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER
Adv. P D JADEJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHEBUBBHAI MAMADBHAI GABOL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Principal Civil Judge at Kalavad partly allowed PGVCL's suit against defendant Mahebubbhai Gabol for electricity theft recovery. The court found the defendant had illegally obtained a direct connection from an electric pole, committing theft of electricity, and upheld the due amount of Rs. 23,397-13. However, the court reduced the interest rate from the claimed 16% p.a. to 6% p.a. from the suit's filing date, as no specific contractual agreement on interest existed. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount with interest and bear all costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 131/2025
Summary The Principal Civil Judge at Kalavad partly allowed PGVCL's suit against defendant Mahebubbhai Gabol for electricity theft recovery. The court found the defendant had illegally obtained a direct connection from an electric pole, committing theft of electricity, and upheld the due amount of Rs. 23,397-13. However, the court reduced the interest rate from the claimed 16% p.a. to 6% p.a. from the suit's filing date, as no specific contractual agreement on interest existed. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount with interest and bear all costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts