PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER vs MAHEBUBBHAI MAMADBHAI GABOL — 131/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 20th April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJM110018682025

Case disposed

Filing Number

131/2025

Filing Date

15-10-2025

Registration No

131/2025

Registration Date

15-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER

Adv. P D JADEJA

Respondent(s)

MAHEBUBBHAI MAMADBHAI GABOL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

20-04-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

16-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

03-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

29-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Principal Civil Judge at Kalavad partly allowed PGVCL's suit against defendant Mahebubbhai Gabol for electricity theft recovery. The court found the defendant had illegally obtained a direct connection from an electric pole, committing theft of electricity, and upheld the due amount of Rs. 23,397-13. However, the court reduced the interest rate from the claimed 16% p.a. to 6% p.a. from the suit's filing date, as no specific contractual agreement on interest existed. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount with interest and bear all costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Civil Judge at Kalavad partly allowed PGVCL's suit against defendant Mahebubbhai Gabol for electricity theft recovery. The court found the defendant had illegally obtained a direct connection from an electric pole, committing theft of electricity, and upheld the due amount of Rs. 23,397-13. However, the court reduced the interest rate from the claimed 16% p.a. to 6% p.a. from the suit's filing date, as no specific contractual agreement on interest existed. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount with interest and bear all costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case