PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER vs FATMABEN VALIMIYA NAGANI SAIYAD — 129/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJM110018662025

Filing Number

129/2025

Filing Date

15-Oct-2025

Registration No

129/2025

Registration Date

15-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER

    Adv. P D JADEJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FATMABEN VALIMIYA NAGANI SAIYAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: PGVCL v. Fatmaben Valimiya Nagani Saiyad (129/2025) The court found the defendant committed electricity theft by making an illegal direct connection to the electric pole. The court partly allowed PGVCL's suit, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 57,526.63 with 6% per annum interest from the suit's institution date, rejecting PGVCL's claim for 16% interest due to insufficient documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 129/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PGVCL v. Fatmaben Valimiya Nagani Saiyad (129/2025) The court found the defendant committed electricity theft by making an illegal direct connection to the electric pole. The court partly allowed PGVCL's suit, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 57,526.63 with 6% per annum interest from the suit's institution date, rejecting PGVCL's claim for 16% interest due to insufficient documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case