PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER vs SUMARBHAI HAJIBHAI SAMA — 127/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 20th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJM110018642025
Filing Number
127/2025
Filing Date
15-Oct-2025
Registration No
127/2025
Registration Date
15-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER
Adv. P D JADEJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUMARBHAI HAJIBHAI SAMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: PGVCL v. Sumarbhai Hajibhai Sama (127/2025) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery. The defendant illegally obtained a direct connection from an electric pole without authorization, and PGVCL's inspection team prepared necessary documents evidencing this theft. The court found the defendant liable for Rs. 31,047-73 but reduced the interest rate from the claimed 16% p.a. to 6% p.a. from the suit's filing date, as no specific contract documenting the higher rate existed between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 127/2025
Case Summary: PGVCL v. Sumarbhai Hajibhai Sama (127/2025) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery. The defendant illegally obtained a direct connection from an electric pole without authorization, and PGVCL's inspection team prepared necessary documents evidencing this theft. The court found the defendant liable for Rs. 31,047-73 but reduced the interest rate from the claimed 16% p.a. to 6% p.a. from the suit's filing date, as no specific contract documenting the higher rate existed between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts