PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER vs AJITSINH KALYANSINH ZALA — 124/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJM110018492025

Filing Number

124/2025

Filing Date

09-Oct-2025

Registration No

124/2025

Registration Date

09-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER

    Adv. P D JADEJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJITSINH KALYANSINH ZALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: PGVCL v. Ajitsinh Kalyansinh Zala (124/2025) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against the defendant for electricity theft. The court found the defendant had illegally obtained a direct connection from an electric pole, committing theft of electricity. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 49,158.85 with interest at 6% per annum from the suit date (not the requested 16%), and to bear all costs. The defendant did not contest the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 09-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 09-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 124/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PGVCL v. Ajitsinh Kalyansinh Zala (124/2025) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against the defendant for electricity theft. The court found the defendant had illegally obtained a direct connection from an electric pole, committing theft of electricity. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 49,158.85 with interest at 6% per annum from the suit date (not the requested 16%), and to bear all costs. The defendant did not contest the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case