PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER vs VANK MAHESHBHAI VAJUBHAI — 121/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 04th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJM110018462025
Filing Number
121/2025
Filing Date
09-Oct-2025
Registration No
121/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER
Adv. P D JADEJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.VANK MAHESHBHAI VAJUBHAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: RCS 121/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against defendant Maheshbhai Vajubhai Vank for electricity theft. The court found the defendant guilty of illegally obtaining a direct electricity connection from the pole and ordered him to pay Rs. 33,859-07 with 6% per annum interest from the suit's filing date. The court reduced the claimed interest rate from 16% to 6% p.a., as the plaintiff failed to produce a specific contract supporting the higher rate, citing RBI prevailing conditions and Section 34 of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Nov-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 121/2025
Case Summary: RCS 121/2025 The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against defendant Maheshbhai Vajubhai Vank for electricity theft. The court found the defendant guilty of illegally obtaining a direct electricity connection from the pole and ordered him to pay Rs. 33,859-07 with 6% per annum interest from the suit's filing date. The court reduced the claimed interest rate from 16% to 6% p.a., as the plaintiff failed to produce a specific contract supporting the higher rate, citing RBI prevailing conditions and Section 34 of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts