PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER vs JADAV KESHUBHAI MAKVANA — 112/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 04th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJM110017492025
Filing Number
112/2025
Filing Date
08-Sep-2025
Registration No
112/2025
Registration Date
08-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER
Adv. P D JADEJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.JADAV KESHUBHAI MAKVANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: PGVCL v. Jadav Keshubhai Makwana (R.C.S. No. 112/2025) The Principal Civil Judge at Kalavad partly allowed PGVCL's suit against the defendant for electricity theft recovery. The court found the defendant guilty of illegally obtaining electricity by making a direct neutral connection from an electric pole, and ordered him to pay Rs. 14,204-43 with 6% per annum interest from the suit date. The court reduced the claimed 16% interest to 6% due to insufficient documentary evidence of the higher agreed rate, while rejecting the defendant's default appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Nov-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2025
Case Summary: PGVCL v. Jadav Keshubhai Makwana (R.C.S. No. 112/2025) The Principal Civil Judge at Kalavad partly allowed PGVCL's suit against the defendant for electricity theft recovery. The court found the defendant guilty of illegally obtaining electricity by making a direct neutral connection from an electric pole, and ordered him to pay Rs. 14,204-43 with 6% per annum interest from the suit date. The court reduced the claimed 16% interest to 6% due to insufficient documentary evidence of the higher agreed rate, while rejecting the defendant's default appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts