THE STAT PC V P JADEJA vs HARUNBHAI ABDULBHAI MANSI Advocate - J N JADEJA — 897/2020
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM110010972020
Filing Number
897/2020
Filing Date
04-Nov-2020
Registration No
897/2020
Registration Date
04-Nov-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202056200254
Police Station
KALAVAD RURAL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STAT PC V P JADEJA
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARUNBHAI ABDULBHAI MANSI Advocate - J N JADEJA
-
2.BABUBHAI GOPALBHAI SORATHIYA(Absconding)
-
3.ISMAILBHAI DAUDBHAI DAL
-
4.NAGJIBHAI HARJIBHAI CHAVDA(Absconding)
-
5.MUKESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI SAKHIYA(Absconding)
-
6.KISHORBHAI BACHUBHAI GAMDHA(Absconding)
-
7.JUNUSHBHAI UMARBHAI CHARAN
Adv. M H JUNEJA
-
8.KHIMJIBHAI NARSHIBHAI PUROHIT
Adv. P M CHANDRAPAL
-
9.RAMEHSBHAI BABUBHAI MAKWANA
Adv. P M CHANDRAPAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Case 897/2020 Court Decision: The court acquitted accused persons 2, 4, 5, and 6 due to insufficient evidence, while convicting accused persons 1, 3, 7, 8, and 9 under IPC Section 12 (wrongful confinement) and CrPC Section 255(1). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt through independent witness testimony, as only police witnesses corroborated the prosecution's version while witness testimony was inadequate. Key Facts: The case involved alleged wrongful confinement and extortion of Rs. 26,980 occurring on June 10, 2020, in Khankolda village. The prosecution's primary evidence rested on police investigation and witness accounts, but the court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including absence of independent corroboration and failure to establish the accused's presence at the crime scene conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jan-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Apr-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jul-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jan-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Dec-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Nov-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jul-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jun-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jan-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Oct-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Sep-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jul-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jun-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Apr-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Mar-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Nov-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 897/2020
Case Summary: Criminal Case 897/2020 Court Decision: The court acquitted accused persons 2, 4, 5, and 6 due to insufficient evidence, while convicting accused persons 1, 3, 7, 8, and 9 under IPC Section 12 (wrongful confinement) and CrPC Section 255(1). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt through independent witness testimony, as only police witnesses corroborated the prosecution's version while witness testimony was inadequate. Key Facts: The case involved alleged wrongful confinement and extortion of Rs. 26,980 occurring on June 10, 2020, in Khankolda village. The prosecution's primary evidence rested on police investigation and witness accounts, but the court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including absence of independent corroboration and failure to establish the accused's presence at the crime scene conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts