Government of Gujarat vs RAJESHBHAI JERAMBHAI THUMMAR Advocate - J B LASHKARI — 595/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM110007422025

Filing Number

595/2025

Filing Date

07-May-2025

Registration No

595/2025

Registration Date

07-May-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202030240483

Police Station

KALAVAD TOWN POLICE STATION- JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESHBHAI JERAMBHAI THUMMAR Advocate - J B LASHKARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: Criminal Case No. 595/2025 The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 188 (disobedience to public servant's order) and MV Act Section 185 (drunk driving), finding the prosecution failed to establish a credible case. The court noted significant evidentiary gaps: the blood sample testing procedure lacked proper documentation (Form C), independent witnesses were not examined, and the investigating officer failed to follow proper medico-legal protocols. The court held that without reliable medical evidence of alcohol consumption and procedural compliance, conviction was unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 06-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 17-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 07-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 07-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 595/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: Criminal Case No. 595/2025 The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 188 (disobedience to public servant's order) and MV Act Section 185 (drunk driving), finding the prosecution failed to establish a credible case. The court noted significant evidentiary gaps: the blood sample testing procedure lacked proper documentation (Form C), independent witnesses were not examined, and the investigating officer failed to follow proper medico-legal protocols. The court held that without reliable medical evidence of alcohol consumption and procedural compliance, conviction was unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case