Government of Gujarat vs DAYABEN BHIMJIBHAI MAKWANA Advocate - H R JADEJA — 401/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(KH),506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM110004412024
Filing Number
401/2024
Filing Date
26-02-2024
Registration No
401/2024
Registration Date
26-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202030230358
Police Station
KALAVAD TOWN POLICE STATION- JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DAYABEN BHIMJIBHAI MAKWANA Advocate - H R JADEJA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 19-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 30-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 22-12-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 294(b) (obscene conduct) and 504 (breach of peace through threat), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasized that while the complainant alleged threatening and obscene conduct, the prosecution's case relied heavily on contradictory witness testimonies and lacked corroborating documentary evidence, thus failing to meet the required standard of proof for criminal conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 294(b) (obscene conduct) and 504 (breach of peace through threat), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasized that while the complainant alleged threatening and obscene conduct, the prosecution's case relied heavily on contradictory witness testimonies and lacked corroborating documentary evidence, thus failing to meet the required standard of proof for criminal conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts