Government of Gujarat vs DAYABEN BHIMJIBHAI MAKWANA Advocate - H R JADEJA — 401/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(KH),506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM110004412024

Filing Number

401/2024

Filing Date

26-Feb-2024

Registration No

401/2024

Registration Date

26-Feb-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202030230358

Police Station

KALAVAD TOWN POLICE STATION- JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(KH),506(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAYABEN BHIMJIBHAI MAKWANA Advocate - H R JADEJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 294(b) (obscene conduct) and 504 (breach of peace through threat), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasized that while the complainant alleged threatening and obscene conduct, the prosecution's case relied heavily on contradictory witness testimonies and lacked corroborating documentary evidence, thus failing to meet the required standard of proof for criminal conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 14-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 19-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 30-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 26-Jun-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 27-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 14-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 31-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 03-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 12-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 15-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 18-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 21-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 26-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 401/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 294(b) (obscene conduct) and 504 (breach of peace through threat), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasized that while the complainant alleged threatening and obscene conduct, the prosecution's case relied heavily on contradictory witness testimonies and lacked corroborating documentary evidence, thus failing to meet the required standard of proof for criminal conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case