PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER vs SAVITABEN MAVJIBHAI CHANABHAI CHANDRAPAL — 10/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,36. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 16th May 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJJM110002302026
Filing Number
10/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
10/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL THROUGH DTY ENGINEER
Adv. P D JADEJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAVITABEN MAVJIBHAI CHANABHAI CHANDRAPAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petition filed by PGVCL through its Deputy Engineer against Savitaben Mavjibhai Chanabhai Chandrapal. The respondent had challenged Section 08 of the relevant Act, and the court found that all amounts due under the disputed order had been paid, the decree was satisfied, and no grounds remained for further proceedings. Consequently, the court ordered the dismissal of the case with costs imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-May-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Apr-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2026
The court dismissed the petition filed by PGVCL through its Deputy Engineer against Savitaben Mavjibhai Chanabhai Chandrapal. The respondent had challenged Section 08 of the relevant Act, and the court found that all amounts due under the disputed order had been paid, the decree was satisfied, and no grounds remained for further proceedings. Consequently, the court ordered the dismissal of the case with costs imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts