Government of Gujarat vs HARESHBHAI RAVJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 1068/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100013552025
Filing Number
1068/2025
Filing Date
31-12-2025
Registration No
1068/2025
Registration Date
31-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250494
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HARESHBHAI RAVJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - N B CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 31-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case 1068/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Hareshbhai Ravjibhai Vaghela, was acquitted of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although contraband liquor (4 liters valued at ₹800) was allegedly recovered from the accused's possession on July 1, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish its case reliably. The only witness (Panch Farukbhai Rajkabhai Dosani) merely confirmed signing the seizure panchnama but provided no substantive testimony supporting the charges. The court noted the absence of independent police witnesses and cited precedent that witness credibility and evidence quality—not mere quantity—determines guilt. Given these gaps, the court held the prosecution failed to prove the case and ordered the accused's acquittal with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case 1068/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Hareshbhai Ravjibhai Vaghela, was acquitted of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although contraband liquor (4 liters valued at ₹800) was allegedly recovered from the accused's possession on July 1, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish its case reliably. The only witness (Panch Farukbhai Rajkabhai Dosani) merely confirmed signing the seizure panchnama but provided no substantive testimony supporting the charges. The court noted the absence of independent police witnesses and cited precedent that witness credibility and evidence quality—not mere quantity—determines guilt. Given these gaps, the court held the prosecution failed to prove the case and ordered the accused's acquittal with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts