Government of Gujarat vs HARESHBHAI RAVJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 1068/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM100013552025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1068/2025

Filing Date

31-12-2025

Registration No

1068/2025

Registration Date

31-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202014250494

Police Station

DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HARESHBHAI RAVJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - N B CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

31-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

31-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case 1068/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Hareshbhai Ravjibhai Vaghela, was acquitted of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although contraband liquor (4 liters valued at ₹800) was allegedly recovered from the accused's possession on July 1, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish its case reliably. The only witness (Panch Farukbhai Rajkabhai Dosani) merely confirmed signing the seizure panchnama but provided no substantive testimony supporting the charges. The court noted the absence of independent police witnesses and cited precedent that witness credibility and evidence quality—not mere quantity—determines guilt. Given these gaps, the court held the prosecution failed to prove the case and ordered the accused's acquittal with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 1068/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Hareshbhai Ravjibhai Vaghela, was acquitted of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although contraband liquor (4 liters valued at ₹800) was allegedly recovered from the accused's possession on July 1, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish its case reliably. The only witness (Panch Farukbhai Rajkabhai Dosani) merely confirmed signing the seizure panchnama but provided no substantive testimony supporting the charges. The court noted the absence of independent police witnesses and cited precedent that witness credibility and evidence quality—not mere quantity—determines guilt. Given these gaps, the court held the prosecution failed to prove the case and ordered the accused's acquittal with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case