Government of Gujarat vs SALMABEN W/O RAFIKBHAI MAKAVANA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 1047/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100013342025
Filing Number
1047/2025
Filing Date
30-12-2025
Registration No
1047/2025
Registration Date
30-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250234
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SALMABEN W/O RAFIKBHAI MAKAVANA Advocate - N B CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 30-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case 1047/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dholka, acquitted the accused Salmaben (wife of Rafikbhai Makavana) of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for alleged illegal possession of 2 liters of alcohol valued at ₹400 without proper permit. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The sole witness (a panchnama signatory) provided no credible corroboration of the case; the police witnesses were not examined; and considering the absence of independent evidence and procedural gaps, the court concluded the prosecution could not prove that the seized material was actually prohibited liquor or that it was recovered from the accused's possession as alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case 1047/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dholka, acquitted the accused Salmaben (wife of Rafikbhai Makavana) of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for alleged illegal possession of 2 liters of alcohol valued at ₹400 without proper permit. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The sole witness (a panchnama signatory) provided no credible corroboration of the case; the police witnesses were not examined; and considering the absence of independent evidence and procedural gaps, the court concluded the prosecution could not prove that the seized material was actually prohibited liquor or that it was recovered from the accused's possession as alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts