Government of Gujarat vs SALIMBHAI ABDULBHAI JUNEJA Advocate - S A DAL — 1046/2025

JudegementView PDF

Case Summary: Criminal Case 1046/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Droll, acquitted defendant Salimbhai Abdulbhai Juneja of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness (Panch Punabhai Hemabhai Zapda) merely testified to signing the panchnama without providing substantive evidence linking the accused to the prohibited liquor allegedly recovered from his possession. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no independent witnesses were examined, the police witness testimony was not recorded, and the panch witness could not corroborate the prosecution's narrative. Applying established criminal jurisprudence principles, the court held that the quality and credibility of evidence matter more than witness count, and the prosecution's failure to present convincing evidence rendered the charge unsustainable. The accused was acquitted and ordered to furnish bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 1046/2025