Government of Gujarat vs GOPALBHAI RASUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA — 1045/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM100013322025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1045/2025

Filing Date

30-12-2025

Registration No

1045/2025

Registration Date

30-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202014250319

Police Station

DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

GOPALBHAI RASUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

30-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case 1045/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant Gopalbhai Rasubhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A). The prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although prohibited liquor (3 liters valued at Rs. 600) was allegedly seized from the accused's possession on 25/04/2025, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. The sole witness (Panch Farukbhai Rajakbhai Dosani) only testified about signing the seizure memo but provided no substantive evidence supporting the prosecution's case. The absence of independent witnesses and police testimony further weakened the prosecution's evidence, creating reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 1045/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant Gopalbhai Rasubhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A). The prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although prohibited liquor (3 liters valued at Rs. 600) was allegedly seized from the accused's possession on 25/04/2025, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. The sole witness (Panch Farukbhai Rajakbhai Dosani) only testified about signing the seizure memo but provided no substantive evidence supporting the prosecution's case. The absence of independent witnesses and police testimony further weakened the prosecution's evidence, creating reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case