Government of Gujarat vs GOBARBHAI BHARABHAI JAKHANIYA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 1043/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM100013302025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1043/2025

Filing Date

30-12-2025

Registration No

1043/2025

Registration Date

30-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202014250108

Police Station

DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

GOBARBHAI BHARABHAI JAKHANIYA Advocate - N B CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

30-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 1043/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhriol acquitted defendant Gobarbhai Bharabhai Jakhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole panchanama witness provided testimony that merely confirmed signing the document without offering substantive evidence linking the accused to the prohibited liquor allegedly recovered. Key Reasoning: The court noted that absent corroborating independent witness testimony, police officer statements, or credible evidence establishing the accused's possession of the one-liter bottle of alcohol valued at ₹200, the prosecution could not discharge its burden of proof. The evidentiary weaknesses and absence of supporting documentation created reasonable doubt regarding guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1043/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhriol acquitted defendant Gobarbhai Bharabhai Jakhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole panchanama witness provided testimony that merely confirmed signing the document without offering substantive evidence linking the accused to the prohibited liquor allegedly recovered. Key Reasoning: The court noted that absent corroborating independent witness testimony, police officer statements, or credible evidence establishing the accused's possession of the one-liter bottle of alcohol valued at ₹200, the prosecution could not discharge its burden of proof. The evidentiary weaknesses and absence of supporting documentation created reasonable doubt regarding guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case