Government of Gujarat vs GOBARBHAI BHARABHAI JAKHANIYA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 1043/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100013302025
Filing Number
1043/2025
Filing Date
30-12-2025
Registration No
1043/2025
Registration Date
30-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250108
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
GOBARBHAI BHARABHAI JAKHANIYA Advocate - N B CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 30-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1043/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhriol acquitted defendant Gobarbhai Bharabhai Jakhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole panchanama witness provided testimony that merely confirmed signing the document without offering substantive evidence linking the accused to the prohibited liquor allegedly recovered. Key Reasoning: The court noted that absent corroborating independent witness testimony, police officer statements, or credible evidence establishing the accused's possession of the one-liter bottle of alcohol valued at ₹200, the prosecution could not discharge its burden of proof. The evidentiary weaknesses and absence of supporting documentation created reasonable doubt regarding guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1043/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhriol acquitted defendant Gobarbhai Bharabhai Jakhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole panchanama witness provided testimony that merely confirmed signing the document without offering substantive evidence linking the accused to the prohibited liquor allegedly recovered. Key Reasoning: The court noted that absent corroborating independent witness testimony, police officer statements, or credible evidence establishing the accused's possession of the one-liter bottle of alcohol valued at ₹200, the prosecution could not discharge its burden of proof. The evidentiary weaknesses and absence of supporting documentation created reasonable doubt regarding guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts