Government of Gujarat vs FARUKBHAI GAFARBHAI JUNEJA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 1041/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100013282025
Filing Number
1041/2025
Filing Date
30-Dec-2025
Registration No
1041/2025
Registration Date
30-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250101
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.FARUKBHAI GAFARBHAI JUNEJA Advocate - N B CHAVDA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1041/2025 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dholka acquitted accused Farukbhai Gafarbhai Juneja of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65P(A)(A) for alleged illegal possession of 3 liters of liquor worth ₹600 without proper permit on 10/02/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the sole panchnama witness could not adequately corroborate the seizure and no independent police witnesses testified. The court ruled that the recovered prohibited material cannot be confirmed as contraband, and acquitted the accused while imposing bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1041/2025
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1041/2025 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dholka acquitted accused Farukbhai Gafarbhai Juneja of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65P(A)(A) for alleged illegal possession of 3 liters of liquor worth ₹600 without proper permit on 10/02/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the sole panchnama witness could not adequately corroborate the seizure and no independent police witnesses testified. The court ruled that the recovered prohibited material cannot be confirmed as contraband, and acquitted the accused while imposing bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts