Government of Gujarat vs FARUKBHAI GAFARBHAI JUNEJA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 1041/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM100013282025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1041/2025

Filing Date

30-12-2025

Registration No

1041/2025

Registration Date

30-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202014250101

Police Station

DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

FARUKBHAI GAFARBHAI JUNEJA Advocate - N B CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

30-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1041/2025 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dholka acquitted accused Farukbhai Gafarbhai Juneja of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65P(A)(A) for alleged illegal possession of 3 liters of liquor worth ₹600 without proper permit on 10/02/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the sole panchnama witness could not adequately corroborate the seizure and no independent police witnesses testified. The court ruled that the recovered prohibited material cannot be confirmed as contraband, and acquitted the accused while imposing bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1041/2025 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dholka acquitted accused Farukbhai Gafarbhai Juneja of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65P(A)(A) for alleged illegal possession of 3 liters of liquor worth ₹600 without proper permit on 10/02/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the sole panchnama witness could not adequately corroborate the seizure and no independent police witnesses testified. The court ruled that the recovered prohibited material cannot be confirmed as contraband, and acquitted the accused while imposing bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case