Government of Gujarat vs GOPALBHAI RASULBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA — 1039/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100013262025
Filing Number
1039/2025
Filing Date
30-12-2025
Registration No
1039/2025
Registration Date
30-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250111
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
GOPALBHAI RASULBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 30-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Gopalbhai Rasulbhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing 2 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹400, finding the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasized that the panchnama witness provided weak testimony without independent corroboration, and the complainant/police witness was not examined, resulting in reasonable doubt that undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Gopalbhai Rasulbhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing 2 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹400, finding the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasized that the panchnama witness provided weak testimony without independent corroboration, and the complainant/police witness was not examined, resulting in reasonable doubt that undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts