Government of Gujarat vs REKHABEN NITESHBHAI LADHUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA — 1037/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100013242025
Filing Number
1037/2025
Filing Date
30-12-2025
Registration No
1037/2025
Registration Date
30-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250087
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
REKHABEN NITESHBHAI LADHUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 30-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1037/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Droll, acquitted defendant Rekhaben Niteshbhai Ladhubhai Vaghela of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65A(A). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the sole witness (panch/concerned person) merely confirmed signing the seizure document but provided no substantive corroboration of the allegations, and no independent police witness testimony was presented. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish its case adequately. While prohibited liquor (3 liters worth ₹600) was allegedly seized from the accused on 06/02/2025, the court found the evidence lacked the required quality and reliability, particularly the absence of credible independent witnesses and police testimony, making conviction impossible under criminal procedure standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1037/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Droll, acquitted defendant Rekhaben Niteshbhai Ladhubhai Vaghela of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65A(A). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the sole witness (panch/concerned person) merely confirmed signing the seizure document but provided no substantive corroboration of the allegations, and no independent police witness testimony was presented. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish its case adequately. While prohibited liquor (3 liters worth ₹600) was allegedly seized from the accused on 06/02/2025, the court found the evidence lacked the required quality and reliability, particularly the absence of credible independent witnesses and police testimony, making conviction impossible under criminal procedure standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts