Government of Gujarat vs REKHABEN NITESHBHAI LADHUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA — 1037/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM100013242025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1037/2025

Filing Date

30-12-2025

Registration No

1037/2025

Registration Date

30-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202014250087

Police Station

DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

REKHABEN NITESHBHAI LADHUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

30-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 1037/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Droll, acquitted defendant Rekhaben Niteshbhai Ladhubhai Vaghela of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65A(A). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the sole witness (panch/concerned person) merely confirmed signing the seizure document but provided no substantive corroboration of the allegations, and no independent police witness testimony was presented. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish its case adequately. While prohibited liquor (3 liters worth ₹600) was allegedly seized from the accused on 06/02/2025, the court found the evidence lacked the required quality and reliability, particularly the absence of credible independent witnesses and police testimony, making conviction impossible under criminal procedure standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1037/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Droll, acquitted defendant Rekhaben Niteshbhai Ladhubhai Vaghela of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65A(A). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the sole witness (panch/concerned person) merely confirmed signing the seizure document but provided no substantive corroboration of the allegations, and no independent police witness testimony was presented. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish its case adequately. While prohibited liquor (3 liters worth ₹600) was allegedly seized from the accused on 06/02/2025, the court found the evidence lacked the required quality and reliability, particularly the absence of credible independent witnesses and police testimony, making conviction impossible under criminal procedure standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case