PROPRIETOR OF SHIFA ROADLINES DHROL, HANIFBHAI NURMAMADBHAI HAMIRANI vs SHABIR AMAD JIVRANI — 6/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,139,142. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVERTED TO on 27th April 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJJM100002942026
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVERTED TO
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PROPRIETOR OF SHIFA ROADLINES DHROL, HANIFBHAI NURMAMADBHAI HAMIRANI
Adv. H D PARMAR
Respondent(s)
SHABIR AMAD JIVRANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 30-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Inquiry 6/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dhrol found prima facie evidence that respondent Shabir Amad Jivrani committed an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court issued a summons against the respondent for the offense of dishonoring a cheque worth ₹1,75,000 drawn on December 12, 2015, which was returned unpaid on January 9, 2026 due to insufficient funds, and where the petitioner provided written demand notice on January 17, 2026, which the respondent failed to honor within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Inquiry 6/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dhrol found prima facie evidence that respondent Shabir Amad Jivrani committed an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court issued a summons against the respondent for the offense of dishonoring a cheque worth ₹1,75,000 drawn on December 12, 2015, which was returned unpaid on January 9, 2026 due to insufficient funds, and where the petitioner provided written demand notice on January 17, 2026, which the respondent failed to honor within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts