Government of Gujarat vs SANTABEN W/O RAJUBHAI PARESHA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 189/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100001932026
Filing Number
189/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
189/2026
Registration Date
15-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250540
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SANTABEN W/O RAJUBHAI PARESHA Advocate - N B CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case 189/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Drol, acquitted Santaben (wife of Rajubhai Paresha) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the sole witness (a panchnama signatory) provided no substantive corroboration of the alleged offense, and the absence of independent police witness testimony, combined with procedural irregularities, created sufficient reasonable doubt to warrant acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case 189/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Drol, acquitted Santaben (wife of Rajubhai Paresha) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the sole witness (a panchnama signatory) provided no substantive corroboration of the alleged offense, and the absence of independent police witness testimony, combined with procedural irregularities, created sufficient reasonable doubt to warrant acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts