Government of Gujarat vs JILUBEN W/O NANJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA — 188/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM100001922026

Case disposed

Filing Number

188/2026

Filing Date

15-01-2026

Registration No

188/2026

Registration Date

15-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

1120014250560

Police Station

DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JILUBEN W/O NANJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

15-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case 188/2026 Court Decision: The accused Jiluben W/O Nanjibhai Vaghela was acquitted of charges under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court found insufficient evidence to prove that prohibited liquor was recovered from the accused's possession on 25/07/2025. Key Reasoning: The prosecution relied solely on one panch (witness) whose testimony merely confirmed he signed the seizure memo but provided no substantive evidence supporting the case. The court noted the absence of independent corroborating witnesses and police testimony, creating doubt about whether the seized material was actually prohibited contraband under the prohibition law. Applying established criminal law principles regarding burden of proof and witness credibility, the court determined the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 188/2026 Court Decision: The accused Jiluben W/O Nanjibhai Vaghela was acquitted of charges under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court found insufficient evidence to prove that prohibited liquor was recovered from the accused's possession on 25/07/2025. Key Reasoning: The prosecution relied solely on one panch (witness) whose testimony merely confirmed he signed the seizure memo but provided no substantive evidence supporting the case. The court noted the absence of independent corroborating witnesses and police testimony, creating doubt about whether the seized material was actually prohibited contraband under the prohibition law. Applying established criminal law principles regarding burden of proof and witness credibility, the court determined the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case