Government of Gujarat vs CHAMPABEN W/O MANSUKHBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 187/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100001912026
Filing Number
187/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
187/2026
Registration Date
15-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250700
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
CHAMPABEN W/O MANSUKHBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - N B CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case 187/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhole acquitted defendant Champaben W/O Mansukhbhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) on March 16, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence proving the alleged illegal possession of 2 liters of liquor without permit on September 14, 2025. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the lone witness (a panch/magistrate witness) provided testimony only regarding signing the panchnama (official document) but offered no substantive evidence supporting the case. Additionally, the prosecution failed to examine independent police witnesses who could corroborate the allegations, rendering the case doubtful and unproven beyond reasonable doubt under criminal procedure standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case 187/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhole acquitted defendant Champaben W/O Mansukhbhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) on March 16, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence proving the alleged illegal possession of 2 liters of liquor without permit on September 14, 2025. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the lone witness (a panch/magistrate witness) provided testimony only regarding signing the panchnama (official document) but offered no substantive evidence supporting the case. Additionally, the prosecution failed to examine independent police witnesses who could corroborate the allegations, rendering the case doubtful and unproven beyond reasonable doubt under criminal procedure standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts